diff options
| author | merakor <cem@ckyln.com> | 2021-01-06 12:59:37 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | merakor <cem@ckyln.com> | 2021-01-06 12:59:37 +0000 |
| commit | 7c57b882a8476af5372cb8d3c74261207ce905d8 (patch) | |
| tree | 69abe4d6c250d4f670c8369a88e3b882d4f630fa | |
| parent | eaac8627f197aa0d621b0962000c0709687cb303 (diff) | |
| download | cpt-experiment/lazyload.tar.gz | |
README: fix wordingexperiment/lazyload
FossilOrigin-Name: 40d358107676a1cdc8b46a570fb0d5fef635623d66ad9c436f4f56c7be4c4c75
| -rw-r--r-- | README | 7 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
@@ -5,8 +5,11 @@ libraries of the functions when they were called. I tested this out, because I assumed that the result would be an increase of speed, but it turned out that the answer was quite the contrary. -Using the master branch (757d256), running `cpt l` takes 33 seconds. -Using this branch, it takes 37 seconds. +I have compared the speed by running `cpt l` 2000 times on my system which has +429 packages: + +- Using the master branch (757d256), it takes 33 seconds. +- Using this branch, it takes 37 seconds. Even though, this currently slows the operation, I would love to revisit this branch someday if I come up with a better idea for lazyloading functions. At the |