Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
These key combinations should repeat correctly when the keys are
pressed and held.
Before this change, they do this erratically - many repeats are "eaten"
because they are treated as unrecognized ESC seqs:
ESC 0x7f is treated by Alt+baskspace, but ESC 0x7f ESC 0x7f ESC 0x7f
is unrecognized.
Escape sequences corresponding to these key combinations are moved from
read_line_input to lineedit_read_key.
Also, these key sequences are now enabled regardless of whether
FEATURE_EDITING_VI is set, since Vim does not actually support these key
combinations, but they are present in readline library.
function old new delta
static.esccmds 93 103 +10
read_line_input 3737 3687 -50
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Skudnov <rostislav@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Fix matching failure when plist is advanced while checking for buffered
lines - the lines in the hunk that are about to be added should be
skipped when checking for matching context.
Also add a valid test case that fails with current busybox and is fixed
by the change.
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
If we reach the end of plist it means the input has still data while we
are expecting EOF. Fix the log to avoid a crash.
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
While at it, fix a pathological case where it is not fine:
-r REALM with some 8-kbyte long REALM would overflow the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
For example, without swapoff, code shrinks by 277 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Indirect calls are more difficult to predict.
Unfortunately, on x64 direct call is 5 bytes while indirect "call (reg+ofs)"
is 3 bytes:
function old new delta
i_getch - 82 +82
i_peek - 63 +63
parse_stream 2531 2579 +48
parse_dollar 771 797 +26
parse_redirect 296 321 +25
add_till_closing_bracket 408 420 +12
encode_string 256 265 +9
i_peek_and_eat_bkslash_nl 93 99 +6
add_till_backquote 110 114 +4
parse_and_run_stream 139 141 +2
expand_vars_to_list 1143 1144 +1
static_peek 6 - -6
setup_string_in_str 39 18 -21
setup_file_in_str 40 19 -21
static_get 27 - -27
file_peek 52 - -52
file_get 65 - -65
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 2/4 grow/shrink: 9/2 up/down: 278/-192) Total: 86 bytes
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
PIPE_SEQ is used most often, having it zero makes code smaller:
function old new delta
done_word 719 707 -12
parse_stream 2546 2531 -15
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
I thought gcc can detect this itself. It doesn't.
function old new delta
run_list 1030 1021 -9
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
function old new delta
insert_bg_job 366 281 -85
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|
|
Was playing with "sleep 3 | exit 3 & wait %1" and noticed that often
SIGCHLD arrives even before I get to signal masking. Can avoid it in this
case.
function old new delta
wait_for_child_or_signal 228 265 +37
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
|