From 10ad622dc2a9fb6563fab13719ead8baf15ff9e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denys Vlasenko Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:13:32 +0200 Subject: Spelling fixes in comments, documentation, tests and examples By klemens Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko --- networking/ntpd.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'networking/ntpd.c') diff --git a/networking/ntpd.c b/networking/ntpd.c index 5cc71ca7a..73d27ac20 100644 --- a/networking/ntpd.c +++ b/networking/ntpd.c @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct globals { * too big and we will step. I observed it with -6. * * OTOH, setting precision_sec far too small would result in futile - * attempts to syncronize to an unachievable precision. + * attempts to synchronize to an unachievable precision. * * -6 is 1/64 sec, -7 is 1/128 sec and so on. * -8 is 1/256 ~= 0.003906 (worked well for me --vda) @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ reset_peer_stats(peer_t *p, double offset) bool small_ofs = fabs(offset) < STEP_THRESHOLD; /* Used to set p->filter_datapoint[i].d_dispersion = MAXDISP - * and clear reachable bits, but this proved to be too agressive: + * and clear reachable bits, but this proved to be too aggressive: * after step (tested with suspending laptop for ~30 secs), * this caused all previous data to be considered invalid, * making us needing to collect full ~8 datapoints per peer @@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ update_local_clock(peer_t *p) * It looks like Linux kernel's PLL is far too gentle in changing * tmx.freq in response to clock offset. Offset keeps growing * and eventually we fall back to smaller poll intervals. - * We can make correction more agressive (about x2) by supplying + * We can make correction more aggressive (about x2) by supplying * PLL time constant which is one less than the real one. * To be on a safe side, let's do it only if offset is significantly * larger than jitter. -- cgit v1.2.3