| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Before this patch, we're effectively doing `pidof -x` all the time. This
patch changes names_to_pid() to allow us to say whether or not we want to
include scripts, and adjusts the callers appropriately.
Also add tests for `pidof` versus `pidof -x` which pass after this
patch, without regressing the existing killall tests.
|
|
Be consistent about upper versus lower case. (Upper seems to have the
majority, so I went with that, though I'm happy to provide the opposite
patch as long as we're consistent!)
Be consistent about using \t. (Though saving a few bytes seems like it
might be better done in the code that generates help.h rather than
directly in the source, since tabs make careful ASCII art layout hard
enough that we regularly have things misaligned.)
Remove trailing periods (most of which seem to have been added by me).
Always use the US "human readable" rather than my British
"human-readable", and be more consistent about declaring whether we're
showing multiples of 1000 or 1024.
Just say "verbose" rather than adding a useless "mode" or "output".
|
|
|
|
|
|
confusing update-alternatives, the paths of the links installed by toybox should
match those installed by busybox. This is accomplished by changing the flags
of a few tools within toybox.
|
|
|
|
(Fix it.)
|
|
for_each_pid_with_name_in_array_perform_callback_function_upon_translated_value() with name_to_pid(), comparing absolute paths or just basename() consistently as spotted by Lukasz Skalski, and adjust callers.
|
|
|
|
The <1 has to come first in the option string, normalize whitespace,
sprintf of %d maxes out at -2 billion ala 12 bytes with null terminator so
we don't need a length check in a 4k buffer, use the "%*s" feature of printf
to prepend whitespace for us, take advantage of c99 defining ! to return 0 or 1.
|
|
|
|
right in years (ubuntu broke its' vim implementation). Remove trailing spaces. Add/remove blank lines. Re-wordwrap in places. Update documentation with new coding style.
The actual code should be the same afterward, this is just cosmetic refactoring.
|
|
|
|
|
