From 62f00217cf92ec33b6a4700d1560cefe28eac1dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Landley Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:15:30 -0600 Subject: Update link to posix in docs (open group broke their website). --- www/roadmap.html | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/roadmap.html b/www/roadmap.html index 69095d11..ea705fff 100755 --- a/www/roadmap.html +++ b/www/roadmap.html @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ for Toybox's 1.0 release.

Our current candidate list combines the commands toybox already implements, the development environment command list, the toolbox standard commands, -various vendor configurations of busybox, a selected subset of the SUSv4 +various vendor configurations of busybox, a selected subset of the POSIX/SUSv4 standard, a couple of the less-insane bits of LSB, a few outright requests, plus additional to-be-determined shell functionality.

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ the IEEE POSIX committee's 2008 standard, the Single Unix Specification version 4, and the Open Group Base Specification edition 7 are all the same standard from three sources.

-

The "utilities" +

The "utilities" section of these standards is devoted to the unix command line, and are the best such standard for our purposes. (My earlier work on BusyBox was implemented with @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ they DID standardize tends to be respected.

The Linux Standard Base's failure mode is different, they respond to pressure by including special-case crap, such as allowing Red Hat to shoehorn -RPM on the standard even though all sorts of distros (from Debian to Slackware) -don't use it and probably never will. This means anything in the LSB is +RPM on the standard even though all sorts of distros (Debian, Slackware, Arch, +Gentoo) don't use it and probably never will. This means anything in the LSB is at best a suggestion: arbitrary portions of this standard are widely ignored.

-- cgit v1.2.3