From e4341aa1d4f48978563d3538a96be7736831e89c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Landley Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:19:43 -0600 Subject: Fix the old dead link about mepis with one from linux.com. (Thanks Christian Holtje.) --- www/licenserant.html | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/licenserant.html b/www/licenserant.html index e3c0a927..b6af90f3 100755 --- a/www/licenserant.html +++ b/www/licenserant.html @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@

The reason for the clarification of section 3 is that -what the FSF did to Mepis was inexcusable. (Further discussed +what the FSF did to Mepis was inexcusable. (Further discussed in this thread.)

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ company that was acting in good faith.

clarifying that if you didn't modify the source code, and the binaries you're distributing can be entirely regenerated from a public upstream source, pointing to that upstream source in good faith is good enough for us. As -long as the upstream source don't doesn't object to the extra bandwidth, +long as the upstream source doesn't object to the extra bandwidth, and the correct source code stays available at that location you specify for the duration of your responsiblity to redistribute source, life is good.

-- cgit v1.2.3