From 62f00217cf92ec33b6a4700d1560cefe28eac1dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Landley
Our current candidate list combines the commands toybox already implements, the development environment command list, the toolbox standard commands, -various vendor configurations of busybox, a selected subset of the SUSv4 +various vendor configurations of busybox, a selected subset of the POSIX/SUSv4 standard, a couple of the less-insane bits of LSB, a few outright requests, plus additional to-be-determined shell functionality.
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ the IEEE POSIX committee's 2008 standard, the Single Unix Specification version 4, and the Open Group Base Specification edition 7 are all the same standard from three sources. -The "utilities"
+ The "utilities"
section
of these standards is devoted to the unix command line, and are the best such
standard for our purposes. (My earlier work on BusyBox was implemented with
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ they DID standardize tends to be respected. The Linux Standard Base's failure mode is different, they respond to
pressure by including special-case crap, such as allowing Red Hat to shoehorn
-RPM on the standard even though all sorts of distros (from Debian to Slackware)
-don't use it and probably never will. This means anything in the LSB is
+RPM on the standard even though all sorts of distros (Debian, Slackware, Arch,
+Gentoo) don't use it and probably never will. This means anything in the LSB is
at best a suggestion: arbitrary portions of this standard are widely
ignored.