From c88d3b8bfa339a00a42187529a87085ca68b5a1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:29:50 -0500
Subject: Minor roadmap intro tweak.

---
 www/roadmap.html | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'www/roadmap.html')

diff --git a/www/roadmap.html b/www/roadmap.html
index 0ca1714e..b13b8b9c 100644
--- a/www/roadmap.html
+++ b/www/roadmap.html
@@ -27,8 +27,9 @@ of Linux no matter what Ubuntu says. This doesn't mean including the full
 set of Bash 4.x functionality, but does involve {various,features} &lt(beyond)
 posix.</p>
 
-<p>See the <a href=status.html>status page</a> for the combined list
-and progress towards implementing it.</p>
+<p>See the <a href=status.html>status page</a> for the categorized command list
+and progress towards implementing it. There's also a
+<a href=todo.html>historical todo list</a> from the project's 2011 relaunch.</p>
 
 <ul>
 <li><a href=#susv4>POSIX-2008/SUSv4</a></li>
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ and progress towards implementing it.</p>
 <p>The best standards describe reality rather than attempting to impose a
 new one. A good standard should document, not legislate.
 Standards which document existing reality tend to be approved by
-more than one standards body, such ANSI and ISO both approving C. That's why
+more than one standards body, such ANSI and ISO both approving <a href=https://landley.net/c99-draft.html>C99</a>. That's why
 the IEEE POSIX committee's 2008 standard, the Single Unix Specification version
 4, and the Open Group Base Specification edition 7 are all the same standard
 from three sources, but most people just call it "posix" (portable operating
-- 
cgit v1.2.3