From 601d5f275212eb60b4265a7693f47b4446ee55f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cem Keylan Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 20:52:09 +0200 Subject: gcc: add new package at 12.1.0 [TESTING] --- testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch (limited to 'testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch') diff --git a/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch b/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fe5c6143 --- /dev/null +++ b/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +Author: Timo Teräs + +Alpine musl package provides libssp_nonshared.a. We link to it unconditionally, +as otherwise we get link failures if some objects are -fstack-protector built +and final link happens with -fno-stack-protector. This seems to be the common +case when bootstrapping gcc, the piepatches do not seem to fully fix the +crosstoolchain and bootstrap sequence wrt. stack-protector flag usage. + +--- gcc-6.1.0/gcc/gcc.c.orig ++++ gcc-6.1.0/gcc/gcc.c +@@ -870,8 +870,7 @@ + + #ifndef LINK_SSP_SPEC + #ifdef TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP +-#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \ +- "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit:}" ++#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "-lssp_nonshared" + #else + #define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \ + "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit" \ -- cgit v1.2.3