From 94f0a981af99f24e3e16608d9cdc03213f3c40dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cem Keylan Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:20:09 +0300 Subject: gcc: drop testing package --- testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch | 20 -------------------- 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch (limited to 'testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch') diff --git a/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch b/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch deleted file mode 100644 index fe5c6143..00000000 --- a/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ -Author: Timo Teräs - -Alpine musl package provides libssp_nonshared.a. We link to it unconditionally, -as otherwise we get link failures if some objects are -fstack-protector built -and final link happens with -fno-stack-protector. This seems to be the common -case when bootstrapping gcc, the piepatches do not seem to fully fix the -crosstoolchain and bootstrap sequence wrt. stack-protector flag usage. - ---- gcc-6.1.0/gcc/gcc.c.orig -+++ gcc-6.1.0/gcc/gcc.c -@@ -870,8 +870,7 @@ - - #ifndef LINK_SSP_SPEC - #ifdef TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP --#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \ -- "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit:}" -+#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "-lssp_nonshared" - #else - #define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \ - "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit" \ -- cgit v1.2.3