From fd96fb22b064afee03ec6047117b294f6357cd5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cem Keylan <cem@ckyln.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 04:02:07 +0300
Subject: update

---
 docs/blog/20200508.html | 6 +++---
 docs/blog/20200508.txt  | 6 +++---
 docs/news.xml           | 2 +-
 docs/rss.xml            | 8 ++++----
 src/blog/20200508.md    | 6 +++---
 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/blog/20200508.html b/docs/blog/20200508.html
index 930c861..5da6210 100644
--- a/docs/blog/20200508.html
+++ b/docs/blog/20200508.html
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ compatibility on my fork of the <a href="https://github.com/carbslinux/kiss">pac
 without any more issues, on OpenBSD and FreeBSD. The biggest
 issues remaining are choosing a vendor for BSD, packaging the
 BSD source, and providing a minimal base (like busybox for BSD).
-If you aren&rsquo;t familiar with BSD, BSD has a single source code
-for all of the utilities. Contributions (even chipping in ideas)
-are very welcome.</p>
+If you aren&rsquo;t familiar with BSD, it has a single source code
+for all of the utilities (kernel, command line programs, etc.).
+Contributions (even chipping in ideas) are very welcome.</p>
 
 <p>Adding binary package distribution support natively to the package
 manager. Biggest issue in small/old computers are compile times.
diff --git a/docs/blog/20200508.txt b/docs/blog/20200508.txt
index e661697..8e5f316 100644
--- a/docs/blog/20200508.txt
+++ b/docs/blog/20200508.txt
@@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ compatibility on my fork of the [package manager]. I have tested,
 without any more issues, on OpenBSD and FreeBSD. The biggest
 issues remaining are choosing a vendor for BSD, packaging the
 BSD source, and providing a minimal base (like busybox for BSD).
-If you aren't familiar with BSD, BSD has a single source code
-for all of the utilities. Contributions (even chipping in ideas)
-are very welcome.
+If you aren't familiar with BSD, it has a single source code
+for all of the utilities (kernel, command line programs, etc.).
+Contributions (even chipping in ideas) are very welcome.
 
 Adding binary package distribution support natively to the package
 manager. Biggest issue in small/old computers are compile times.
diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
index 196d845..3269147 100644
--- a/docs/news.xml
+++ b/docs/news.xml
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 <description>a simple busybox linux distribution</description>		
 <link>https://carbslinux.org</link>
 <atom:link href="https://carbslinux.org/news.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
-<lastBuildDate>May Fri 2020 00:00</lastBuildDate>
+<lastBuildDate>May Fri 2020 01:00</lastBuildDate>
 <item>
 <title>20200427.news</title>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020</pubDate>
diff --git a/docs/rss.xml b/docs/rss.xml
index 7126fe8..75c6249 100644
--- a/docs/rss.xml
+++ b/docs/rss.xml
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 <description>a simple busybox linux distribution</description>		
 <link>https://carbslinux.org</link>
 <atom:link href="https://carbslinux.org/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
-<lastBuildDate>May Fri 2020 00:00</lastBuildDate>
+<lastBuildDate>May Fri 2020 01:00</lastBuildDate>
 <item>
 <title>The Relation of Carbs and KISS</title>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020</pubDate>
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ compatibility on my fork of the &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/carbslinux/k
 without any more issues, on OpenBSD and FreeBSD. The biggest
 issues remaining are choosing a vendor for BSD, packaging the
 BSD source, and providing a minimal base (like busybox for BSD).
-If you aren&amp;rsquo;t familiar with BSD, BSD has a single source code
-for all of the utilities. Contributions (even chipping in ideas)
-are very welcome.&lt;/p&gt;
+If you aren&amp;rsquo;t familiar with BSD, it has a single source code
+for all of the utilities (kernel, command line programs, etc.).
+Contributions (even chipping in ideas) are very welcome.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;Adding binary package distribution support natively to the package
 manager. Biggest issue in small/old computers are compile times.
diff --git a/src/blog/20200508.md b/src/blog/20200508.md
index f4c2b2f..ee59814 100644
--- a/src/blog/20200508.md
+++ b/src/blog/20200508.md
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ compatibility on my fork of the [package manager]. I have tested,
 without any more issues, on OpenBSD and FreeBSD. The biggest
 issues remaining are choosing a vendor for BSD, packaging the
 BSD source, and providing a minimal base (like busybox for BSD).
-If you aren't familiar with BSD, BSD has a single source code
-for all of the utilities. Contributions (even chipping in ideas)
-are very welcome.
+If you aren't familiar with BSD, it has a single source code
+for all of the utilities (kernel, command line programs, etc.).
+Contributions (even chipping in ideas) are very welcome.
 
 Adding binary package distribution support natively to the package
 manager. Biggest issue in small/old computers are compile times.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3