aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCem Keylan <cem@ckyln.com>2020-06-08 15:54:13 +0300
committerCem Keylan <cem@ckyln.com>2020-06-08 15:54:13 +0300
commit4fcce90011261991ae23cc7043c4dbb75c457714 (patch)
treef87682b8dc28d3eeb8748494cfcc11072fb54468 /testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch
parentacc549ba95e22617bb9f97e27b4512d51ec0618e (diff)
downloadrepository-4fcce90011261991ae23cc7043c4dbb75c457714.tar.gz
gcc: add new package at 10.1.0
Diffstat (limited to 'testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch')
-rw-r--r--testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch b/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fe5c6143
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gcc/patches/musl-libssp.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Author: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
+
+Alpine musl package provides libssp_nonshared.a. We link to it unconditionally,
+as otherwise we get link failures if some objects are -fstack-protector built
+and final link happens with -fno-stack-protector. This seems to be the common
+case when bootstrapping gcc, the piepatches do not seem to fully fix the
+crosstoolchain and bootstrap sequence wrt. stack-protector flag usage.
+
+--- gcc-6.1.0/gcc/gcc.c.orig
++++ gcc-6.1.0/gcc/gcc.c
+@@ -870,8 +870,7 @@
+
+ #ifndef LINK_SSP_SPEC
+ #ifdef TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP
+-#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \
+- "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit:}"
++#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "-lssp_nonshared"
+ #else
+ #define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all" \
+ "|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-explicit" \